- Page 1
- Page 2 - Page 3 - Page 4 - Page 5 - Page 6 - Page 7 - Page 8 - Page 9 - Page 10 - Page 11 - Page 12 - Page 13 - Page 14 - Page 15 - Page 16 - Page 17 - Page 18 - Page 19 - Page 20 - Page 21 - Page 22 - Page 23 - Page 24 - Page 25 - Page 26 - Page 27 - Page 28 - Page 29 - Page 30 - Page 31 - Page 32 - Page 33 - Page 34 - Page 35 - Page 36 - Page 37 - Page 38 - Page 39 - Page 40 - Page 41 - Page 42 - Page 43 - Page 44 - Page 45 - Page 46 - Page 47 - Page 48 - Page 49 - Page 50 - Page 51 - Page 52 - Page 53 - Page 54 - Page 55 - Page 56 - Page 57 - Page 58 - Page 59 - Page 60 - Page 61 - Page 62 - Page 63 - Page 64 - Page 65 - Page 66 - Page 67 - Page 68 - Page 69 - Page 70 - Page 71 - Page 72 - Page 73 - Page 74 - Page 75 - Page 76 - Page 77 - Page 78 - Page 79 - Page 80 - Page 81 - Page 82 - Page 83 - Page 84 - Page 85 - Page 86 - Page 87 - Page 88 - Page 89 - Page 90 - Page 91 - Page 92 - Page 93 - Page 94 - Page 95 - Page 96 - Page 97 - Page 98 - Page 99 - Page 100 - Flash version © UniFlip.com |
Operant Conditioning
We have enhanced the industry standard software for writing behavioral experiment protocols. Now, it is even easier to design the most complex experiments by simple point-and-click through Graphic State® 4 software. Designed to allow researchers to create interactive experiment-control protocols for behavioral experiments using state logic, Graphic State® 4 offers a new elegance with unparalleled power and incredible simplicity. With a simple “point and click” the user selects options and represents the structure of each state graphically. Inherently user-friendly, the screen contains all the options and acts as a universal prompt. Any questions can be resolved by activating our context sensitive help screens. Graphic State® 4 structures the experiment as a series of states through which the experiment moves, with each state specifying a stimulus configuration in the test environment, a set of time and/or response requirements which cause the program to exit that state and progress to the next. The software indicates when each state and the entire protocol are logically complete so that the session cannot end up “hanging” unable to progress to a Finish state. , Our software offers a complete data analysis structure with graphic and digital analysis in which counts, rate, latencies and durations can be created. A data file log in text format is included so the user can specify events to be highlighted and save for analyses in other programs.
Ordering Information
Order # Gs4.0 Gs4-UP U90-11 Product graphic State® 4 Software graphic State® 4 upgrade (requires u90-10)
Operant Conditioning
uSb interface
note
RefeRences
Graphic state® 4 software is used in conjunction with the Habitest Modular Test system hardware – please see pages 14-15 for more information on the options available to configure the optimal behavioral research configuration for your application.
Aparicio CF et al. (2015) A long-term study of the impulsive choices of Lewis and Fischer 344 rats. Learn Behav. 2015 Sep;43(3):251-71. Ball KT et al. (2015) Yohimbine reinstates extinguished 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA; ecstasy) seeking in rats with prior exposure to chronic yohimbine. Behav Brain Res. 2015 Aug 1;294:1-6. Bassareo V et al. (2015) Monitoring dopamine transmission in the rat nucleus accumbens shell and core during acquisition of nose-poking for sucrose. Behav Brain Res. 2015 Jul 1;287:200-6. Ruda-Kucerova J et al. (2015) Sex Differences in the Reinstatement of Methamphetamine Seeking after Forced Abstinence in Sprague-Dawley Rats. Front Psychiatry. 2015 Jul 6;6:91. Botanas CJ et al. (2015) Methoxetamine, a ketamine derivative, produced conditioned place preference and was self-administered by rats: Evidence of its abuse potential. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2015 Jun;133:31-6. Shelkar GP et al. (2015) Alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone modulates ethanol selfadministration in posterior ventral tegmental area through melanocortin-4 receptors. Addict Biol. 2015 Mar;20(2):302-15. Cyr M et al. (2015) Deficit in sustained attention following selective cholinergic lesion of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus in rat, as measured with both post-mortem immunocytochemistry and in vivo PET imaging with [¹⁸F]fluoroethoxybenzovesamicol. Behav Brain Res. 2015 Feb 1;278:107-14. (5CSRTT) Perova Z et al. (2015) Depression of excitatory synapses onto parvalbumin interneurons in the medial prefrontal cortex in susceptibility to stress. J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 18;35(7):3201-6. Tipps ME et al. (2015) Acute ethanol withdrawal impairs contextual learning and enhances cued learning. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 Feb;39(2):282-90. Wen JL et al. (2015) Involvement of the dopaminergic system in the consolidation of fear conditioning in hippocampal CA3 subregion. Behav Brain Res. 2015 Feb 1;278:527-34. Shimp KG et al. (2015) Affective and cognitive mechanisms of risky decision making. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2015 Jan;117:60-70.
• Graphic State®4 Software for Behavioral Applications
Graphic State® 4 Allows
• Ability to create subject-draw lists that assign subjects in order or randomly • Global stimuli, once activated the stimuli will be on in every state • Stimuli can be set to flash on/off at user selectable rates for user defined periods of time
www.panlab.com
•
www.coulbourn.com
17
|